http://www.marissaneave.com/2009/04/race-and-privilege-canada-according-to-coupland/ art + space + audience Thu, 28 Oct 2010 05:33:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.marissaneave.com/2009/04/race-and-privilege-canada-according-to-coupland/comment-page-1/#comment-654 Marissa Tue, 05 May 2009 21:13:11 +0000 http://www.marissaneave.com/?p=478#comment-654 I say we're both right. The sentence you commented on can be easily misconstrued. I'm sure, if a poke is easiest, you can find plenty of opportunities for them in the archives! I say we’re both right. The sentence you commented on can be easily misconstrued. I’m sure, if a poke is easiest, you can find plenty of opportunities for them in the archives!

]]> http://www.marissaneave.com/2009/04/race-and-privilege-canada-according-to-coupland/comment-page-1/#comment-653 Duncan Tue, 05 May 2009 21:05:09 +0000 http://www.marissaneave.com/?p=478#comment-653 No, I think you're right and I'm wrong. I simply misread your article. I suspect that I was so stimulated by your site that I wanted to comment on it and (being a guy) found it easiest to do that with a poke. Sorry! No, I think you’re right and I’m wrong. I simply misread your article. I suspect that I was so stimulated by your site that I wanted to comment on it and (being a guy) found it easiest to do that with a poke. Sorry!

]]> http://www.marissaneave.com/2009/04/race-and-privilege-canada-according-to-coupland/comment-page-1/#comment-652 Marissa Tue, 05 May 2009 20:38:35 +0000 http://www.marissaneave.com/?p=478#comment-652 Hi Duncan! Thanks for your comment. Perhaps my writing is not clear, but I do mean that 1992 is not the past at all. There is a misconception that appropriating Native imagery ended in the 1920s or some other such bygone era. What I am trying to say here is that it is an unfortunate practice that continues to this day. I think my remark would be more clear if I had said, "proving it is not <em>just</em> a problem of the past." Hi Duncan! Thanks for your comment. Perhaps my writing is not clear, but I do mean that 1992 is not the past at all. There is a misconception that appropriating Native imagery ended in the 1920s or some other such bygone era. What I am trying to say here is that it is an unfortunate practice that continues to this day. I think my remark would be more clear if I had said, “proving it is not just a problem of the past.”

]]> http://www.marissaneave.com/2009/04/race-and-privilege-canada-according-to-coupland/comment-page-1/#comment-651 Duncan Tue, 05 May 2009 20:29:36 +0000 http://www.marissaneave.com/?p=478#comment-651 Marissa, this is a wonderful site. You really have lot of offer. But I did giggle when I read "As recently as 1992 (proving that this is not a problem of the past,) ". Is 1992 really the past, in the grand scheme of things? Marissa, this is a wonderful site. You really have lot of offer. But I did giggle when I read “As recently as 1992 (proving that this is not a problem of the past,) “. Is 1992 really the past, in the grand scheme of things?

]]>